<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Game Druid &#187; Graphics Cards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegamedruid.com/category/hardware/graphics-cards-hardware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegamedruid.com</link>
	<description>Video Gaming Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:01:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia GeForce GTX 590 vs AMD Radeon 6990</title>
		<link>http://www.thegamedruid.com/2011/08/nvidia-geforce-gtx-590-vs-amd-radeon-6990/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thegamedruid.com/2011/08/nvidia-geforce-gtx-590-vs-amd-radeon-6990/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 04:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gamedruid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Add ons & Accessories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC Hardware Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegamedruid.com/?p=4081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reviewed by Marcus &#8216;The Sloth&#8217; Maximus &#8211; Hardware Editor for The Game Druid Let&#8217;s get right to the review without mincing words. You&#8217;re wondering why we&#8217;re reviewing this card now since it&#8217;s been out for the last 5 odd months? Because I&#8217;m The Sloth; and I&#8217;ll do whatever I damn please &#8211; when I want [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="al2fb_like_button"><div id="fb-root"></div><script>(function(d, s, id) {
  var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
  if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
  js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
  js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1&appId=122673837762130";
  fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));</script>
<fb:like href="http://www.thegamedruid.com/2011/08/nvidia-geforce-gtx-590-vs-amd-radeon-6990/" layout="button_count" show_faces="true" width="450" action="like" font="trebuchet ms" colorscheme="dark" ref="AL2FB"></fb:like></div><h4>Reviewed by Marcus &#8216;The Sloth&#8217; Maximus &#8211; Hardware Editor for The Game Druid</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.thegamedruid.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/590vs6990_homepage-banner_druid.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4082" title="590vs6990_homepage-banner_druid" src="http://www.thegamedruid.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/590vs6990_homepage-banner_druid.jpg" alt="" width="618" height="239" /></a></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get right to the review without mincing words. You&#8217;re wondering why we&#8217;re reviewing this card now since it&#8217;s been out for the last 5 odd months? Because I&#8217;m The Sloth; and I&#8217;ll do whatever I damn please &#8211; when I want and where I want.</p>
<p>Sorry&#8230;I digress. Anyway&#8230;on to the review.</p>
<p>First and foremost &#8211; If you&#8217;re looking for a card to run on your piss poor, sub-par full HD and by Full HD I mean 1080p, no&#8230;1050 is NOT full HD or not almost full HD; and beyond&#8230;you shouldn&#8217;t even consider this card. Also if you&#8217;re thinking that you&#8217;ll be cool by getting this card and get laid more often&#8230;you probably wont. But you will have bragging rights&#8230;Not for getting laid. Get your mind out of the gutter!</p>
<p>again&#8230;.I digress.</p>
<p>So yeah, Full HD and beyond &#8211; with multiple monitors and cash to blow &#8211; this card is for you. $700+ you&#8217;re not going to regret it. I did some checking and in India (for all my Indian fans) this is about INR 34,000 &#8211; 38,000. Yeah. It&#8217;s expensive.</p>
<p>Following closely on the AMD Radeon 6990, the GTX 590 comprises two modified GPUs – in this case the GTX 580– soldered onto a real slab of a circuit board. Nvidia has tweaked clock speeds to fit: the 772MHz cores have been reined in to 607MHz, the 1,544MHz shader clock to 1,224MHz, and the combined 3GB of GDDR5 memory from 4,008MHz to 3,420MHz. Nvidia has retained its familiar stream processor architecture, with 32 clusters across both cores, each containing 32 stream processors. It’s a proven system but, when stacked against the HD 6990, sounds relatively weak: AMD’s card contains 3,072 stream processors alongside 5.2 billion transistors, with the GTX 590 offering 1,024 processors and “just” 3 billion transistors.</p>
<p>According to various benchmarks &#8211; The Nvidia card lagged slightly behind in the less demanding benchmarks. An average of 60fps in a 1,920 x 1,080 Very High quality Crysis test with 8x anti-aliasing is 3fps slower than the HD 6990, and this pattern was repeated in the equivalent Just Cause 2 test, where the Nvidia card scored 90fps to the AMD chip’s 96fps.</p>
<p>But when we really cranked up the settings to enthusiast levels – aided by a triple-monitor setup with a resolution of 5,760 x 1,080 – the GTX 590 showed its strength. It averaged a playable 32fps in the Very High Crysis benchmark at this extreme resolution; the HD 6990 managed 30fps. Adding 8x anti-aliasing widened the gap: the GTX 590’s 23fps average was a massive 10fps quicker than the struggling HD 6990.</p>
<div>Dream-level videocards sometimes suffer from obnoxious fan noise due to the heat from their increased clock and memory speeds. But despite cranking out an amazing 47 frames per second in Metro 2033 and 90fps in STALKER: CoP (at high settings with 4x antialiasing/4x anisotropic filtering and 2560×1600 no less), the GTX 590’s single, center-mounted fan runs ninja-quiet. It’s damn nice to finally get a videocard that doesn’t sound like a helicopter starting up in your PC.That low-decibel output, of course, doesn’t mean the GTX 590 isn’t a power-hungry beast. This card requires no less than two eight-pin power connectors to function. To be on the safe side, I’d recommend at least an 800W power supply to keep the GTX 590 stable (as opposed to the minimum 700W PSU suggested by Nvidia). Like the GTX 580, the GTX 590 supports all the fanciest DirectX 11 perks, such as hardware tessellation, and you can set it to run PhysX with only a minor dip in performance at high resolutions. It’ll also run Nvidia’s 3D Vision.For output, the GTX 590 forgoes an HDMI port in favor of three dual-link DVI connectors and one Mini-Display­Port connector. This is a little odd, but it still supports HDCP (High-band­width Digital Content Protection), so you can watch all your Blu-rays in full 1920×1080 resolution (as long as you’ve got a monitor that’s also HDCP compliant). The good thing about three DVI ports is that hooking up multiple monitors is as simple as plugging in the cables and adjusting the Nvidia display settings on your desktop. (Enabling more than two monitors with different cables can be frustrating.)<br />
As for power usage, Nvidia has made a lot of strides—but apparently not quite enough to even score a definitive win there. While idling in the test-bed desktop, the 6990 uses 148-149 watts (the overclock switch makes a negligible difference), and the GTX 590 160 watts. Under load, in a variation on the Metro 2033 benchmark and measured with an Extech Datalogger, things got slightly more interesting. At its base clock speed, the 6990-equipped system was the winner, at 413 watts. But when the 6990&#8242;s overclocking switch was enabled, its system used functionally the same amount of power as the GTX 590&#8242;s: about 446 watts.</div>
<div>Overall, we highly recommend these cards if you&#8217;re looking for full HD and beyond capabilities. Price to performance ratio &#8211; AMD wins; if noise is a concern; you can&#8217;t go wrong with the Nvidia offering.</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="betterrelated none"><p>No related content found.</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thegamedruid.com/2011/08/nvidia-geforce-gtx-590-vs-amd-radeon-6990/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ultimate HTPC graphics card &#8211; ATI Radeon 5450</title>
		<link>http://www.thegamedruid.com/2010/02/the-ultimate-htpc-graphics-card-ati-radeon-5450/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thegamedruid.com/2010/02/the-ultimate-htpc-graphics-card-ati-radeon-5450/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gamedruid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Graphics Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegamedruid.com/?p=2743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want a graphics card that delivers pure media acceleration without giving 2 cents to gaming? Then you&#8217;re prayers have been answered thanks to the ATI Radeon 5450. Here&#8217;s the low down: For $50 (~INR 2500) &#8211; You get a DX 11 card, with Eyefinity, UVD2 and HDMI support! To add to it&#8230; It&#8217;s built on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="al2fb_like_button"><div id="fb-root"></div><script>(function(d, s, id) {
  var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
  if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
  js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
  js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1&appId=122673837762130";
  fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));</script>
<fb:like href="http://www.thegamedruid.com/2010/02/the-ultimate-htpc-graphics-card-ati-radeon-5450/" layout="button_count" show_faces="true" width="450" action="like" font="trebuchet ms" colorscheme="dark" ref="AL2FB"></fb:like></div><p>Want a graphics card that delivers pure media acceleration without giving 2 cents to gaming? Then you&#8217;re prayers have been answered thanks to the ATI Radeon 5450. Here&#8217;s the low down:</p>
<p>For $50 (~INR 2500) &#8211; You get a DX 11 card, with Eyefinity, UVD2 and HDMI support! To add to it&#8230; It&#8217;s built on a 40nm die, with a core clock speed of 650MHz and only 80 stream processors. What does this mean? It&#8217;s a tiny card, passive cooled, media powerhouse. It has just 12 gigs of memory bandwidth, but 104 GFLOPS of compute performance! Most of the latest onboard graphics cards rate at 40 to 50 GFLOPS &#8211; do the math.</p>
<p>Here are the specs:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.thegamedruid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/specs.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2744 aligncenter" title="specs" src="http://www.thegamedruid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/specs-204x300.jpg" alt="specs" width="204" height="300" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Here&#8217;s what the card looks like:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.thegamedruid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/pic1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2745" title="pic1" src="http://www.thegamedruid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/pic1-300x219.jpg" alt="pic1" width="300" height="219" /></a>Here&#8217;s a little snippet from the Legit Reviews guys:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Adding the Radeon HD 5450 to the test system (AMD X2) added about 7W to the idle numbers, but actually saved 14W of power during movie playback since it didn&#8217;t use as much of the CPU during Blu-ray playback.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>The bottom Line:</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The ATI Radeon HD 5450 might be the best HTPC graphics card ever made. For less then $60 &#8211; you get flawless blu-ray playback with DTS-HD Master Audio bitstreaming!</p>
<div class="betterrelated none"><p>No related content found.</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thegamedruid.com/2010/02/the-ultimate-htpc-graphics-card-ati-radeon-5450/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATI Radeon HD 4890 Specifications</title>
		<link>http://www.thegamedruid.com/2009/03/ati-radeon-hd-4890-specifications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thegamedruid.com/2009/03/ati-radeon-hd-4890-specifications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gamedruid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegamedruid.com/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stand aside 4870s, the ATI Radeon HD 4890 is here!! The HD 4890 card with 1GB GDDR5 memory is expected to give 124.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth, but the memory interface used for the same hasn&#8217;t been confirmed yet. We&#8217;re assuming that ATI incorporated a 256-bit memory interface for wider memory bandwidth. New drivers to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="al2fb_like_button"><div id="fb-root"></div><script>(function(d, s, id) {
  var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
  if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
  js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
  js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1&appId=122673837762130";
  fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));</script>
<fb:like href="http://www.thegamedruid.com/2009/03/ati-radeon-hd-4890-specifications/" layout="button_count" show_faces="true" width="450" action="like" font="trebuchet ms" colorscheme="dark" ref="AL2FB"></fb:like></div><p>Stand aside 4870s, the <strong>ATI Radeon HD 4890</strong> is here!! The HD 4890 card with 1GB GDDR5 memory is expected to give 124.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth, but the memory interface used for the same hasn&#8217;t been confirmed yet. We&#8217;re assuming that ATI incorporated a 256-bit memory interface for wider memory bandwidth.</p>
<p>New drivers to unleash the potential of this RV790 chip are expected to wipe out the fuss after the recent benchmarks leak. In terms of pricing, AMD will be priced way far below Nvidia&#8217;s high-end GTX 280 graphics card and obviously a bit higher than their existing HD 4870.</p>
<p>The <strong>ATI Radeon HD 4890 </strong>specs are as follows:</p>
<p>- GPU: <strong>RV790</strong> @ 850MHz / 40nm<br />
- Memory: 1024Mb GDDR5 @ 3900MHz<br />
- Shader Processors: 800</p>
<p>Release date: April 6th 2009.</p>
<p>But guess what? ATI has confirmed that when the 4890 launches, the prices for the 4850 and 4870, single and X2 variants will not drop.Having said that, I&#8217;d give it a few months depending on how nVidia&#8217;s new cards perform and their strategy.</p>
<p>The big question is, how much faster will it be in real world gaming benchmarks, I don&#8217;t even look at synthetic tests. April 6th, thy name is &#8216;too fking far and I can&#8217;t wait&#8217;.</p>
<div class="betterrelated none"><p>No related content found.</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thegamedruid.com/2009/03/ati-radeon-hd-4890-specifications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

